Should we
set up a political party? This is a question that has come up a number of times
within EOS and the answer has been “no”. EOS hasn’t been set up as a political
organisation but one that aims to research a possible alternative, sustainable,
moneyless, socio-economic system. I personally have never liked the idea of
setting up a political party till we have something we can demonstrate works. The
way to do that is build something and test it out.
Over the
years we have had many discussions and ideas. We have held lectures at Universities,
had many on-line meetings, and written many articles and other publications. We
have had quite a bit of interest on Facebook, with our main group page having 4 157
members as I write. Most of our ideas
are now written up in the Design. We have had some cooperation with other
groups and individuals. Frustratingly, however, we haven’t got much to show for
our work on the ground. We have had many real life meetings and started with
building a bio-dome. However, we are still far from building a community. In
addition, the world seems to be doing nothing but paying lip service to the idea
of sustainability. Despite international agreements here and there we are still
not tacking the main cause of the problem; our current socio-economic system
with its inbuilt need to maintain exponential growth with finite resources and
resulting environmental damage.
So, I’ve
been thinking about “force multipliers”; the idea of trying to maximise return
on the effort we put in, which brings me back to the idea of a political party.
I’m now thinking that perhaps my original objection was wrong, or at least,
partly wrong. EOS should not, itself, get involved in politics but should remain
focused on research. So, I’m thinking of a political party separate from EOS
but one that aims to support the same goals. The idea being that through
politics we can get a leverage to start getting an alternative to our current
system tested and implemented. Start building a sustainable socio-economic
system.
Here are my
initial thoughts:
The Technocracy Party
1. Foundation
ideas
1.1 Pragmatism
1.2 Skill
and expertise; those who know what they are doing make the decisions.
1.3 Reality
based
2. Goal:
2.1 (a) Highest
standard of living (b) for the longest time possible
3. Sub goals
3.1 The
appliance of science to society. Follows from 1.1, 1.3, and 2.1 (a) as science
is our best way to understand the world and the likely consequences of our
actions.
3.2 A
sustainable society. Follows form 2.1 (b) as to achieve the longest time possible
a society must be sustainable and live within the bounds of nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment